Depending on the suffering and the health of a patient, device selection often performs a decisive part in the feasible therapeutic achievement. With appropriate apparatus selection you employ a high probability of achievement with an iontophoresis device to dry. Not necessarily with treatment strictly according to manual successful (independence from sweat) can be reached. In this instance, we are of program and especially following the purchase of training course – with our experience since 1999 in neuro-scientific iontophoresis – aside. With the method Iontophoresis, many have the ability to “get dry”.
excellent feeling when hands / feet / armpits are dried out and warm instead of wet and cool (frog hands). Still, many users delivered their Iontophoresis Machine back – why? We also asked ourselves this issue, most importantly because we are also interested in providing our clients with optimal and successful therapy.
Background information: There are two types of treatment streams: Pulse and DC. DC products deliver the effect of greater effectiveness (sweat resistance) with the same current setting. Now you could come to the conclusion: Fine, I’m sweating heavily, so DC is better for me personally, and cheaper it really is! Unfortunately this is simply not always correct: the therapy with pulse current devices is simply more pleasurable with the same current environment. Consequently, with a pulse-current gadget, you could drive higher currents compared to the direct current, because the current is way better tolerated.
However, the limit values must not become exceeded (Dr. Hoenle specifies a maximum of 25 mA for your feet, 15 mA for the hands and 5 mA for the treatment of the underarms as a limit). These values are not normally achieved with direct current devices, unless the individual is completely insensitive to the procedure stream, which is quite rare, nevertheless, and the skin must also join the complete. Even on your toes, 30 mA DC is a phrase! If you can set 5 mA with a pulse power device beneath the armpits, this might be more than enough to record successful since the skin there is quite thin (and however sensitive) and therefore doesn’t need higher currents. Specifically with the armpits, DC devices can sometimes tolerate just 1mA and thus in some cases no therapeutic achievement may be accomplished. The same pertains to the hands, where you often have minor injuries (nail, etc.) where not merely direct currents can be quite painful. It isn’t so much the topic of the feet, but also the guideline of the word: The pulse current is often a lot more pleasant there as well.